ECG case challenge!

This is a routine preoperative ECG taken on a 66 year old woman scheduled for cataract surgery. She denies all cardiovascular symptoms.
Image

Questions For Thought


1. Does her ECG suggest that she has had a “silent” inferior myocardial infarct?
2. Should she have further evaluation, eg: a stress thallium study, prior to operation?
 
For answer please click here >>>>

Questions & Answers

1. Does her ECG suggest that she has had a “silent” inferior myocardial infarct?

Despite the Q wave and the negative T wave in lead III, this ECG would be considered within normal limits.

2. Should she have further evaluation, eg: a stress thallium study, prior to operation?

No further cardiac evaluation is needed.

Image

 

This isolated Q wave in lead III with a negative T wave is a common normal variant. Remember that lead III is“BIPOLAR”, that is, it is the instantaneous difference in voltage recorded between the left leg and left arm. Therefore it has no special geographic significance in and of itself e.g.: it does not necessarily reflect the inferior wall of the heart.

Notice that when you record lead III, the positive pole of your galvanometer (or ECG recorder) is attached to the left leg and the negative pole is attached to the left arm. Therefore, lead III represents the instantaneous difference in voltage between these two points of the body.

III = aVF – aVL

The voltage recorded at aVL is being continuously subtracted from aVF.

Another way of representing lead III (remember your algebra?) is: III = aVF + (-aVL)

Putting it visually:
Image

So an initial R wave in aVL which is quite common will translate into a Q wave in lead III. This Q wave can be very prominent at times but should not be misinterpreted as due to an inferior infarct. The same is true of the negative T wave in lead III. Notice in this case that a normal positive T wave in aVL is responsible for a negative T wave in lead III.

Beware of lead III! For diagnosing an inferior infarct look first to lead aVF which DOES HAVE true spatial significance and after that to leads III and II to which aVF contributes, but only indirectly.

 

References 
1- Stuart A. Winston, D.O.

2-Michael H. Lehmann, M.D.

3-Richard D. Judge, M.D.

 

About Dr.Nabil Paktin

Cardiologist , M.D.,F.A.C.C.

Posted on May 18, 2013, in Uncategorized. Bookmark the permalink. 2 Comments.

  1. M.Ghows Neda

    Bravo!
    Excellent!

  2. thanks Dear Respected Ostad ; Proff.Dr.”Neda”, peace be upon you !

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Google photo

You are commenting using your Google account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s

%d bloggers like this: